You are here

Greenfield School District


DPI uses keywords that are used to associate content with major category/topic areas. By using this classification system, you are able to click a keyword and see a listing of DPI content that has been associated with this category.

Please scan over the titles below. If you see a topic that interests you, click the Read More link to access the page.

IDEA Complaint Decision 15-042

On June 12, 2015, the Department of Public Instruction (department) received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Greenfield School District. This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint. The issue is whether the district, during the summer of 2014, properly responded to a parent’s request for access to pupil records.

IDEA Complaint Decision 12-003

 

On January 24, 2012, the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Greenfield School District. This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint. The issue is whether the district, during the 2011-12 school year, properly responded to a pupil record request.

 

IDEA Complaint Decision 10-069

On October 25 and November 10, 2010, the Department of Public Instruction received complaints under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the School District of Greenfield on behalf of two students, “Student A” and “Student B.” This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint.

IDEA Complaint Decision 11-012

On February 24, 2011, the Department of Public Instruction received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Greenfield School District, on behalf of her son and daughter. This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint. The issues, which relate to the 2010-11 school year, are whether the district:

IDEA Complaint Decision 07-055

On July 26, 2007, the Department of Public Instruction received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Greenfield School District. This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint. The issue is whether the district properly responded to a parent’s request during the 2006-2007 school year for an independent educational evaluation (IEE).

IDEA Complaint Decision 12-002

On January 13, 2012, the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Greenfield School District. This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint. The issue is whether the district, during the 2011-12 school year, properly responded to a request for an individualized education program (IEP) team meeting and a request for an independent educational evaluation (IEE).

IDEA Complaint Decision 04-046

On October 8, 2004, the Department of Public Instruction received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Greenfield School District. This is the department's decision regarding that complaint. The issues are whether the district, between January and October 2004, implemented a child's individualized education program (IEP) requiring a scan and read software program and supplementary aids and services of modified classroom skill level work.

IDEA Complaint Decision 09-011

On February 13, 2009, the Department of Public Instruction received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Greenfield School District. This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint. The issues are whether the district, in February 2009, properly implemented the student’s individualized education program (IEP) and improperly placed the student in time-out.

IDEA Complaint Decision 08-008

On January 25, 2008 (form dated January 22), the Department of Public Instruction received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Greenfield School District. This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint. The issue is whether the district, during the 2007-2008 school year, properly responded to a parent’s request that the district include an alternate means of communication in her child’s individualized education program (IEP).