DPI uses keywords that are used to associate content with major category/topic areas. By using this classification system, you are able to click a keyword and see a listing of DPI content that has been associated with this category.
Please scan over the titles below. If you see a topic that interests you, click the Read More link to access the page.
On July 13, 2016, the Department of Public Instruction (department) received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Eau Claire Area School District. This is the department’s decision regarding the complaint. The issues are whether the district, during the 2015-16 school year:
On March 30, 2015, the Department of Public Instruction (department) received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Eau Claire School District. This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint. The issues are whether the district, during the 2014-15 school year, properly implemented the student’s individualized education program (IEP) and behavior intervention plan (BIP), and utilized improper seclusion procedures.
On November 6, 2014, the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Eau Claire Area School District. On November 17, 2014, and November 21, 2014, the department received correspondence from Ms. Snider adding additional issues. This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint.
On January 30, 2006, the Department of Public Instruction received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Eau Claire Area School District. This is the departments decision regarding that complaint. The issue is whether the district properly responded to a parent request in September 2005 for a special education evaluation of her child.
On June 6, 2008, the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against Eau Claire Area School District. This is the departments decision regarding that complaint. The issues are whether the district, during the 2007-2008 school year, properly responded to a referral for special education and properly informed the parent about the school districts referral and evaluation procedures.
On May 8, 2006, the Department of Public Instruction received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Eau Claire Area School District. This is the departments decision regarding that complaint. The issues are whether the district improperly restrained a student with a disability in October 2005, properly developed the students individualized education program (IEP) and placement in April 2006; and provided services required by the students IEP between April 20 and May 8, 2006.
On February 7, 2006, the Department of Public Instruction received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Eau Claire Area School District. This is the departments decision regarding that complaint.
On April 1, 2005, the Department of Public Instruction received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Eau Claire Area School District. This is the department's decision regarding that complaint. The issues are whether the district, during the 2004-2005 school year: