DPI uses keywords that are used to associate content with major category/topic areas. By using this classification system, you are able to click a keyword and see a listing of DPI content that has been associated with this category.
Please scan over the titles below. If you see a topic that interests you, click the Read More link to access the page.
On May 24, 2013, the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against XXXXX. This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint. The issues are whether the district, during the 2012-13 school year:
On May 20, 2013, the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against XXXXX. This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint. The issue is whether the district, during the 2012-13 school year, properly responded to written referrals for special education evaluations.
On April 23, 2013, the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against XXXXX. A copy of the complaint is enclosed. This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint. The issue is whether the district, during the 2012-13 school year, properly implemented the student’s behavioral intervention plan (BIP).
On April 22, 2013, the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against XXXXX. This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint. The issues are whether the district, during the 2012-13 school year properly:
On April 17, 2013, the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against XXXXX. This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint. The issues are whether the district inappropriately restrained the student on April 15, 2013, and provided extended school year services (ESY) during the summer of 2012.
On March 28, 2013, the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against XXXXX. This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint. The issue is whether the district, during the 2012-13 school year, properly responded to a parent’s request for a special education evaluation.
On February 18, 2013, the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against XXXXX. This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint. The issues are whether the district, from April 16, 2012, until January 2013, properly implemented the student’s individualized education program (IEP) and provided special education utilizing properly licensed staff.
On March 15, 2013, the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the XXXXX School District. This is the department’s decision regarding that complaint. The issues are whether the district, during the 2012-13 school year, properly implemented the student’s individualized education program (IEP) regarding the provision of specially designed instruction and collection of weekly data, and utilized improper restraint procedures with a student with a disability.
On September 2, 2008, the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) received a complaint under state and federal special education law from xxxxx against the Unnamed School District. On July 25, 2008, the complainant requested a due process hearing regarding eight of the issues. The department proceeded in investigating the final three issues of the complaint and issued a decision on November 3, 2008. On October 7, 2008, the hearing officer dismissed the due process hearing without prejudice. As a result, the department proceeded in investigating the remaining issues.