Overview

Sourcing Local Goods and Services
- Prime vendor (AKA commercial distributor)
- Direct to farmer
- School garden
- Farmer’s market or auction
- Food hub, coop, or aggregator
- Community garden
- USDA Foods, like DoD
- Direct to Processor
Common Procurement Methods
Procuring Local Foods for CNPs Guide
Informal
-
Micro-purchase (non-competitive)
-
Small-purchase (3 Bids and a Buy)
Formal
-
Invitation for Bid (IFB)
-
Request for Proposal (RFP)
Identify Needs and Define Local
Step 1
Step 2
After you do research, use the specifications developed during the RFI to request pricing. You may need to communicate further with suppliers to educate them on your specifications and the unique needs of the Child Nutrition Programs. When the specifications are clearly defined, suppliers will be able to respond completely and provide comparable pricing. A potential supplier must meet the requirements of the product or service outlined in your specification to be considered "responsive".
Example: Locally grown whole beefsteak heirloom tomato (or equivalent slicing tomato), medium size, estimated volume to purchase 15-20 cases per week during growing season.
Crediting Foods for Child Nutrition Programs: A Resource for Local Producers
Step 3
Define local for your SFA. Your definition of local may change by product and season. For informal procurement like micro-purchase and small-purchase, keep the definition in mind when deciding who to contact for pricing. For formal procurement (IFB or RFP), include the definition in your solicitation document in addition to your written technical specifications.
Geographic Preference
As of July 1, 2024 the geographic preference option has expanded to allow use of the term “local” (e.g., “locally grown”, “locally raised”, or “locally caught”) as a required procurement specification for unprocessed agricultural products for the Child Nutrition Programs (CNPs).
Operators may choose to:
- Use local as a specification (i.e., the written description of a product or service that a vendor must meet to be considered responsive to a solicitation) for local unprocessed agricultural products;
- Use a defined scoring advantage (e.g., additional credit or points given to local unprocessed agricultural products during the evaluation of responses to a solicitation) for local unprocessed agricultural products;
- Adopt a mix of both strategies; or,
- Elect not to use any of these approaches.
For more information on using the Geographic Preference, visit the USDA Procuring Local Foods webpage.
Resources and Policy Memos
- USDA Resources for Procuring Local Foods
- Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection
- Informal Solicitation Request Template
Policy Memos
- Purchases of Locally Produced Foods in the School Nutrition Programs Memo #02-26, USDA Policy Memo, 05/22/2002
- Procuring Local Meat, Poultry, Game, and Eggs for Child Nutrition, SP 01-2016, CACFP 01-2016, SFSP 01-2016, USDA, 10/22/2015
- Procurement Geographic Preference Q&As – Part II SP 03-2013, CACFP 02-2013, SFSP 02-2013, USDA,10/09/2012
- Procurement Geographic Preference Q&As SP 18-2011, USDA, 02/01/2011
- Geographic Preference for the Procurement of Unprocessed Agricultural Products in the CNP SP 08-2010, USDA,11/13/2009
- Applying Geographic Preference in Procurement for the CNP - Updates SP 01-2010 CACFP 01-2010 SFSP 01-2010, USDA,10/09/2009