Special Education
-
Special Education Compliance
-
Bulletins
- Information Update Bulletin 26.01
- Information Update Bulletin 24.02
- Information Update Bulletin 24.01
- Information Update Bulletin 23.01
- Information Update Bulletin 22.02
- Information Update Bulletin 22.01
- Information Update Bulletin 21.02
- Information Update Bulletin 21.01
- Information Update Bulletin 20.02
- Information Update Bulletin 20.01
- Information Update Bulletin 19.01
- Information Update Bulletin 18.02
- Information Update Bulletin 18.01
- Information Update Bulletin 14.02
- Information Update Bulletin 14.01
- Information Update Bulletin 13.01
- Information Update Bulletin 12.02
- Information Update Bulletin 11.01
- Information Update Bulletin 10.08
- Information Update Bulletin 10.07
- Information Update Bulletin 10.06
- Information Update Bulletin 10.05
- Information Update Bulletin 10.04
- Information Update Bulletin 10.03
- Information Update Bulletin 10.02
- Information Update Bulletin 10.01
- Information Update Bulletin 07.01
- Information Update Bulletin 06.03
- Information Update Bulletin 06.02
- Information Update Bulletin 06.01
- Information Update Bulletin 03.02
- Information Update Bulletin 01.04
- Information Update Bulletin 01.01
- Information Update Bulletin 00.04
- Information Update Bulletin 00.03
- Information Update Bulletin 98.04
- Information Update Bulletin 99.02
- Dispute Resolution Options
- Equitable Services Requirement: Special Education for Parentally Placed Private School Students
- Medicaid School-Based Services (SBS)
- Procedural Compliance Self-Assessment (PCSA)
- Sample Special Education Forms and Notices
- Seclusion and Physical Restraint
- Section 504
- Special Education Laws
- Special Education and Residential Care Centers (RCCs)
- State Special Education Procedures
-
Bulletins
- Special Education Information for Families
-
Comprehensive Special Education Evaluation
- A Framework for Comprehensive Special Education Evaluation
- Comprehensive Special Education Evaluation: Why it Matters
- Addressing Bias in a Comprehensive Special Education Evaluation
- Comprehensive Special Education Evaluation within a Multi-Level System of Support (MLSS)
- Comprehensive Special Education Evaluation: Related Legal Citations
- Comprehensive Evaluation Supplemental Resources
- Council on Special Education
-
Disability Categories
- Autism
- Blind and Visually Impaired
- Deaf and Hard of Hearing
- Deafblind
- Emotional Behavioral Disability
- Intellectual Disability
- Orthopedic Impairment
- Other Health Impairment
- Significant Developmental Delay
- Specific Learning Disabilities
- Speech or Language Impairment
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Multilingual Learners and Special Education
- Students with the Most Significant Cognitive Disabilities
- Twice Exceptional Students
- Early Childhood Special Education
- Federal Data Collection Statewide Reports
- IDEA Federal Funding
- Individualized Education Programs (IEPs)
- Open Enrollment Special Education
- Related Services
- Resources to Attract, Prepare, and Retain Special Educators and Related Services Providers
- Specially Designed Instruction
- Special Education Paraprofessionals
-
Special Education Learning Resources
- Co-Teaching in Wisconsin
- Director of Special Education and Pupil Services Weekly News Archive
- Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA)
- Implementation Zone
- Inclusive Strategies to Address Behavioral Needs for Students with IEPs
- National Organizations to Support Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices for Students with IEPs
- Professional Learning Events
- Regional Special Education Network (RSN)
- Resources for Health and Safety for Students with Disabilities
- Special Education and Pupil Services Leadership
- Supports for Educating Students with IEPs
- Workload Considerations
- Transition Planning for Students with IEPs
-
Wisconsin's State Performance Plan - Indicators
- State Performance Plan for 2020-2025
- Annual Performance Reports
- Collection of Cyclical Indicators
- Determination of Compliance with IDEA Requirements
-
WI State Performance Plan (SPP) Indicators
- Indicator #1: Graduation
- Indicator #2: Dropout
- Indicator #3: Assessment
- Indicator #4: Suspension and Expulsion
- Indicator #5: Educational Environments
- Indicator #6: Preschool Environments
- Indicator #7: Preschool Outcomes
- Indicator #8: Family Engagement
- Indicators #9 and #10: Disproportionate Representation
- Indicator #11: Child Find
- Indicator #12: Early Childhood Transition
- Indicator #13: Secondary Transition
- Indicator #14: Post School Outcomes
- Indicators #15 & #16: Dispute Resolution Options
- Indicator #17: State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)
- Wisconsin Alternate Academic Achievement Standards
- Special Education A-Z Index
- Temas de educación especial
- Special Education Web Portal
- About Special Education at DPI
IDEA Complaint Decision 04-047
On October 14, 2004, the Department of Public Instruction received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the West Bend School District. This is the department's decision regarding that complaint. The issue is whether the district properly responded to a request in April 2004 for a special education evaluation of a student.
In April 2004, a county social worker submitted a written request for a special education evaluation to staff at the school in the district which the student attended. In response to the letter, district staff contacted the parent to discuss the evaluation request. The parent indicated she would not consent to an evaluation. District teaching staff familiar with the student met to discuss his educational needs. They concluded that his school performance did not evidence a need for special education and decided not to proceed with an evaluation.
State law requires the district to appoint an individualized education program (IEP) team for each child referred for a special education evaluation to determine eligibility for special education. Despite the parent's first response regarding the evaluation, the district was required to send written notice to the parent that it had begun the evaluation. If the IEP team determined that testing was required, the district was required to seek written parent consent for testing. If the parent refused consent, the district could have pursued mediation or a due process hearing in response to the refusal. The child no longer is a resident of the district and was evaluated and found eligible for special education services by the district to which he has moved.
Within thirty days of this decision, the district must submit evidence demonstrating how they will ensure the appropriate staff members are informed that IEP teams must be appointed to determine eligibility for special education in response to written evaluation requests.
This concludes our review of this complaint.
//signed CST 12/7/04
Carolyn Stanford Taylor
Assistant State Superintendent
Division for Learning Support: Equity and Advocacy
Dec/svb