Special Education
-
Special Education Compliance
-
Bulletins
- Information Update Bulletin 26.01
- Information Update Bulletin 24.02
- Information Update Bulletin 24.01
- Information Update Bulletin 23.01
- Information Update Bulletin 22.02
- Information Update Bulletin 22.01
- Information Update Bulletin 21.02
- Information Update Bulletin 21.01
- Information Update Bulletin 20.02
- Information Update Bulletin 20.01
- Information Update Bulletin 19.01
- Information Update Bulletin 18.02
- Information Update Bulletin 18.01
- Information Update Bulletin 14.02
- Information Update Bulletin 14.01
- Information Update Bulletin 13.01
- Information Update Bulletin 12.02
- Information Update Bulletin 11.01
- Information Update Bulletin 10.08
- Information Update Bulletin 10.07
- Information Update Bulletin 10.06
- Information Update Bulletin 10.05
- Information Update Bulletin 10.04
- Information Update Bulletin 10.03
- Information Update Bulletin 10.02
- Information Update Bulletin 10.01
- Information Update Bulletin 07.01
- Information Update Bulletin 06.03
- Information Update Bulletin 06.02
- Information Update Bulletin 06.01
- Information Update Bulletin 03.02
- Information Update Bulletin 01.04
- Information Update Bulletin 01.01
- Information Update Bulletin 00.04
- Information Update Bulletin 00.03
- Information Update Bulletin 98.04
- Information Update Bulletin 99.02
- Dispute Resolution Options
- Equitable Services Requirement: Special Education for Parentally Placed Private School Students
- Medicaid School-Based Services (SBS)
- Procedural Compliance Self-Assessment (PCSA)
- Sample Special Education Forms and Notices
- Seclusion and Physical Restraint
- Section 504
- Special Education Laws
- Special Education and Residential Care Centers (RCCs)
- State Special Education Procedures
-
Bulletins
- Special Education Information for Families
-
Comprehensive Special Education Evaluation
- A Framework for Comprehensive Special Education Evaluation
- Comprehensive Special Education Evaluation: Why it Matters
- Addressing Bias in a Comprehensive Special Education Evaluation
- Comprehensive Special Education Evaluation within a Multi-Level System of Support (MLSS)
- Comprehensive Special Education Evaluation: Related Legal Citations
- Comprehensive Evaluation Supplemental Resources
- Council on Special Education
-
Disability Categories
- Autism
- Blind and Visually Impaired
- Deaf and Hard of Hearing
- Deafblind
- Emotional Behavioral Disability
- Intellectual Disability
- Orthopedic Impairment
- Other Health Impairment
- Significant Developmental Delay
- Specific Learning Disabilities
- Speech or Language Impairment
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Multilingual Learners and Special Education
- Students with the Most Significant Cognitive Disabilities
- Twice Exceptional Students
- Early Childhood Special Education
- Federal Data Collection Statewide Reports
- IDEA Federal Funding
- Individualized Education Programs (IEPs)
- Open Enrollment Special Education
- Related Services
- Resources to Attract, Prepare, and Retain Special Educators and Related Services Providers
- Specially Designed Instruction
- Special Education Paraprofessionals
-
Special Education Learning Resources
- Co-Teaching in Wisconsin
- Director of Special Education and Pupil Services Weekly News
- Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA)
- Implementation Zone
- Inclusive Strategies to Address Behavioral Needs for Students with IEPs
- National Organizations to Support Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices for Students with IEPs
- Professional Learning Events
- Regional Special Education Network (RSN)
- Resources for Health and Safety for Students with Disabilities
- Special Education and Pupil Services Leadership
- Supports for Educating Students with IEPs
- Workload Considerations
- Transition Planning for Students with IEPs
-
Wisconsin's State Performance Plan - Indicators
- State Performance Plan for 2020-2025
- Annual Performance Reports
- Collection of Cyclical Indicators
- Determination of Compliance with IDEA Requirements
-
WI State Performance Plan (SPP) Indicators
- Indicator #1: Graduation
- Indicator #2: Dropout
- Indicator #3: Assessment
- Indicator #4: Suspension and Expulsion
- Indicator #5: Educational Environments
- Indicator #6: Preschool Environments
- Indicator #7: Preschool Outcomes
- Indicator #8: Family Engagement
- Indicators #9 and #10: Disproportionate Representation
- Indicator #11: Child Find
- Indicator #12: Early Childhood Transition
- Indicator #13: Secondary Transition
- Indicator #14: Post School Outcomes
- Indicators #15 & #16: Dispute Resolution Options
- Indicator #17: State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)
- Wisconsin Alternate Academic Achievement Standards
- Special Education A-Z Index
- Temas de educación especial
- Special Education Web Portal
- About Special Education at DPI
IDEA Complaint Decision 08-030
On March 18, 2008, the Department of Public Instruction received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the School District of Beloit. This is the departments decision regarding that complaint. The issue is whether the district properly enabled the student to participate in field trips during the 2006-07 and 2007-08 school years.
The parents complaint focuses on two field trips. The first field trip occurred during the 2006-2007 school year. At the school where the student attends, grade levels are broken down into houses. Two of the three houses attended the field trip. However, the house where the student was assigned did not participate in the trip. The staff for the students house did not include this field trip as part of the curriculum. All of the houses, including the one where the student was assigned, were comprised of both special education and regular education students. The department finds no error in failing to include the student in this field trip. The student did not participate because he was assigned to the house that chose not to participate in the field trip.
During the 2007-08 school year, all of the houses for the students grade level attended a field trip as part of the general education science curriculum. The student was not invited to attend. The district stated the student was not assigned to a house during the 2007-08 academic year because he was placed in a special education classroom for most of the school day, and attended only two regular education classes. The district stated the student did not attend the field trip because he was not assigned to a house, and his special education classroom was not invited to participate. These were the only students in the grade level that were not included in the field trip.
The students IEP for 2007-08 provides that he will be involved full-time in the general curriculum, and consequently, he should have been allowed to participate in the field trip as part of the general education science curriculum. District staff stated additional resources would be required if the student, and others in the special education classroom, were permitted to attend. However, this is not a permissible basis for excluding students with disabilities from field trips. Within 30 days from the date of this decision, the school district must submit a corrective action plan to ensure special education students are properly included in field trips.
This concludes our review of this complaint.
//signed CST 5/19/08
Carolyn Stanford Taylor
Assistant State Superintendent
Division for Learning Support: Equity and Advocacy
Dec/pmw